Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2022 DAILYLAW 793 (JK)

GULZAR AHMAD BEIGH v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR.

CRM(M)/380/2022 · 2026-04-06

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 33 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 380/2022 CrlM(1085/2022) Gulzar Ahmad Beigh. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Faizan Ahmad Ganai, CGC. CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge. ORDER 06.04.2026 01. The record reveals that none appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 23.12.2024, 11.03.2025, 30.04.2025, 14.07.2025. Also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 26.11.2025 and same is the position as on today. It appears that the cause for which the instant petition was filed, may no longer survive or may have been redressed by now. 02. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge SRINAGAR: 06.04.2026 “HAMID” Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 06.04.2026