GULZAR AHMAD BEIGH v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR.
CRM(M)/380/2022 · 2026-04-06
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 793 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 793 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 33 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 380/2022 CrlM(1085/2022) Gulzar Ahmad Beigh. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Faizan Ahmad Ganai, CGC.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 06.04.2026
01. The record reveals that none appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 23.12.2024, 11.03.2025, 30.04.2025, 14.07.2025. Also, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 26.11.2025 and same is the position as on today. It appears that the cause for which the instant petition was filed, may no longer survive or may have been redressed by now.
02. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 06.04.2026
“HAMID”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 06.04.2026