BASHIR AHMED AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/103/2022 · 2026-02-20
Sanjay Parihar
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 770 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 770 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 34 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- CRM(M) No. 103/2022
Bashir Ahmed and another
…. Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through:- None
V/s
Union Territory of J&K and others
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 20.02.2026
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last two consecutive dates of hearing. Even today, when the matter was taken up, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in pursuing the instant petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
( SANJAY PARIHAR )
JUDGE
JAMMU 20.02.2026 Nikhil