RAKESH KUMAR AND ANR v. UT OF J AND K TH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME CIVIL SECRETARIAT JAMMU
WP(C)/2130/2022 · 2026-01-27
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 759 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 759 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 33
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2130/2022
Rakesh Kumar and another
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
UT of J&K
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
27.01.2026
The record reveals that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the last two consecutive dates of hearing, i.e., 11.10.2024 and
20.12.2025. Today also, there is no appearance on their behalf.
It appears that the petitioners are no longer interested in pursuing the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition, along with connected application(s), is dismissed for non appearance and non prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall also stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
Jammu:
27.01.2026 Michal Sharma/PS