Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2022 DAILYLAW 748 (ORI)

ASHOK KUMAR DAS v. SATYABRATA SAHU, ADDL. CHIEF SECY., R AND DM DEPT

CONTC/3102/2022 · 2026-02-06

K R Mohapatra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.3102 of 2022 Ashok Kumar Das …. Petitioner Mr. Saktidhar Das, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Haripada Mohanty, Advocate -versus- Stayabrata Sahu, Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Disaster Management Department and Another …. Opp. Parties Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER Order No. 06.02.2026 06. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. This CONTC has been filed alleging non-compliance of order dated 19th November, 2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.30391 of 2020 wherein this Court directed that in the event the Petitioners move an application for early disposal of Misc. Case No.08 of 1990 stating the grounds therein within a period of two weeks from the date of the said order along with a downloaded authenticated copy of that order, the said application shall be disposed of and follow up action shall be taken by the Tahasildar (Sadar), Cuttack for disposal of Misc. Case No.08 of 1990 fixing a firm date, preferably within a period of six months from the date of filing of such application giving opportunity of hearing to the parties. 3. Compliance affidavit has been filed stating that due to non-production of relevant documents by the Petitioner, the p. 2 Tahasildar (Sadar), Cuttack could not dispose of Misc. Case No.08 of 1990 in time. 4. Mr. Das, learned Senior Advocate appearing along with Mr.Haripada Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has filed an affidavit stating that he has already filed the relevant documents before the Tahasildar (Sadar), Cuttack. 5. Thus, there is no impediment on the part of the Tahasildar (Sadar), Cuttack to dispose of Misc. Case No.08 of 1990 within a stipulated date. 6. Mr. Biswal, learned Additional Standing Counsel submits that if the Petitioner has already submitted the relevant documents, then the Tahasildar (Sadar), Cuttack shall take steps for early disposal of Misc. Case No.08 of 1990. 7. In view of the above, the CONTC is disposed of with an observation that the Tahasildar (Sadar), Cuttack may do well to take steps to dispose of Misc. Case No.08 of 1990 at an early date providing opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge Himansu