(Rev.Pet.No.14/2022) CGHC010009502022 2026:CGHC:33256-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 14 of 2022 {Arising out of judgment dated 26-10-2021 passed in W.A.No.353/2020} 1. Daya Ram Kumhar, S/o Shri Muniya Kumar, aged about 44 years, Posted as Foreman, R/o Qr.No.57, Rajgamar Colliery, Post Rajgamar, Korba East, Tahsil & District Korba, Chhattisgarh 2. Firatram, S/o Dhanshay, aged about 50 years, Post Clipmen, R/o DM-69, Rajgamar Colliery, Post Rajgamar, Korba East, Tahsil & District Korba, Chhattisgarh 3. Shankerlal, S/o Sadhram, aged about 46 years, Post Support Mistri, R/o Qr.No.M-840, Ompur Colliery, Post Rajgamar, Korba East, Tahsil & District Korba, Chhattisgarh 4. Amarnath, S/o Kaleshwar, aged about 51 years, Post Fitter, R/o Qr.No.M/304, Ompur Rajgamar Colliery, Post Rajgamar, Korba East, Tahsil & District Korba, Chhattisgarh (Appellants) ... Petitioners versus 1. Chairman cum Managing Director, SECL, South Eastern Coalfields Limited, Head Office, Sipat Road, Bilaspur, Police Station Sarkanda, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chief General Manager, SECL Korba, Area (East), G.M. Office, Korba (East), District Korba, Chhattisgarh 3. Chief Personal Manager, SECL Korba, Korba Area (East), G.M. Office, Korba (East), District Korba, Chhattisgarh 4. Chief Finance Manager, SECL Korba, Korba Area (East), G.M. Office, Korba (East), District Korba, Chhattisgarh 5. Sub Area Manager, Rajgamar, SECL, Post Rajgamar, Korba (East), District Korba, Chhattisgarh SISTA SOMAYAJULU Digitally signed by SISTA SOMAYAJULU Date: 2026.07.31 17:02:53 +0530 (Rev.Pet.No.14/2022) 6. Sub Area Manager, SECL, Dhelwadih, Post Dhelwadih, Korba (West), District Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. S.V. Purohit, Advocate. For Respondents : Ms. Laxmi Gupta, Advocate. Amicus Curiae : Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Advocate. Division Bench: - Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal and Hon’ble Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal, JJ. Order On Board (31/07/2026) Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 1. This review petition is filed for reviewing the judgment dated 26-10- 2021 passed by this Court in W.A.No.353/2020. 2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the review petition and the annexed documents. 3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after going through the record of the review petition and the documents annexed therewith and also the judgment under review, we do not find any error apparent on the face of record warranting review of judgment dated 26-10-2021 passed by this Court in W.A.No.353/2020. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed finding no sufficient cause for review of the judgment under review. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Judge Soma