Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2022 DAILYLAW 726 (CHH)

RAGHUNATH PRASAD v. NAZMA BEGUM

CRMP/698/2022 · 2026-06-18

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 698 of 2022 Raghunath Prasad S/o Shri Shivbalak Prasad Aged About 50 Years R/o Azad Chowk, Supela, Panch Rasta, Ward No. 12, Police Station Bhilai District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Nazma Begum W/o Mustak Ali Aged About 48 Years R/o Arjun Nagar, Rickshaw Clony, Near Ram Kirana Store, Ward No. 19, Supela Police Station Supela Bhilai District- Durg, Chhattisgarh, Current Address- Ram Nagar, Camp-1 Going Street Via Muktidham, Before Pond, Behind Jain Timber Merchant, Beside Shiv Mandir, West Side, Police Station Vaishali Nagar Bhilai Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate Durg, Collectorate Building Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondent-State : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Digitally signed by SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Date: 2026.06.20 18:27:39 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. 2. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief :- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Quash the order dated 14.12.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Learned Sessions Judge Durg (CG) in Criminal Revision 169 / 2021 and the order dated 20.10.2021 (Annexure P-2) passed by the Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Durg (CG), in the interest of justice.” 3. As per the status report received, the trial has already been concluded on 22.03.2023. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a certificate copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Shubham