Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24952 of 2022
Surendra Kumar Ojha …. Petitioner Mr. Prasanta Kumar Nanda, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others …. Opp. Parties Ms. Suman Pattanayak, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
Order No.
ORDER 20.03.2026
01.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of this application, the Petitioner seeks the following relief:
“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue Rule Nisi calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other writ (s) shall not be issued to quash the proceeding in OPP Case No.01 of 2022 as well as the
order dtd.15.07.2022 passed by the Estate Officer, Koraput under annexure-4 and further be pleased to direct the opp. parties to settle the land in favour of the petitioner in respect of plot. situated near Stadium Complex, Khata No.125/45 in mouza-Kumbha-I under Koraput Tahasil and restrain to interfere the possession of the petitioner situated in respect of plot in Khata no.125/45 in mouza-Kumbha-I under Koraput Tahasil in the district of Koraputa and upon perusal of causes shown in case of the insufficiency, this Hon'ble Court may make the said rule absolute and may pass such other
order/orders as deemed just and proper”
3. Having regard to the provisions contained in the OPP Act, the Petitioner is required to file his objection before the competent authority in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the p. 2 statute. However, considering the fact that the notice was issued on 15.07.2022, it is likely that the matter may have progressed in the meanwhile. Be that as it may, if any cause of action still survives, it is open to the Petitioner to file his objection before the appropriate authority in accordance with law.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
AKPradhan Designation: Senior Stenographer