THALAPPAKATTI HOTELS PRIVATE LTD., v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT
WP(MD)/4648/2022 · 2026-08-20
M Dhandapani, N Dilip Kumar
Transfer Petitionbody2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 5311 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 5311 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P(MD)No.4648 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.08.2026 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.DILIP KUMAR W.P(MD)No.4648 of 2022 and WMP (MD) No.3884 of 2022 Thalapakatti Hotels Private Ltd., Rep. by Authorized Signatory Sivaramakrishnan ... Petitioner vs.
1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Housing and Urban Development, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600009.
2. The Commissioner, Dindigul Municipal Corporation, Dindigul Town Planning Department, 13, Dindigul-Senduraimain Road, Ellis Nagar, Dindigul-624001.
3. Catholic Diaosician Society, Of Dindigul, Rep. by A.Melgi, Secretary Cum Treasurer, Vallan Nagar,Mullipadi 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.4648 of 2022 Village, Dindugal-624005. ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st Respondent made in Letter No.17260/UD4(L.Re-2)/2021-5 dated 16.02.2022 and the consequential notice dated 11.03.2022, issued by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to reconsider the petitioners Section 80-A Appeal afresh, within the time limit fixed by this Honble Court and till then no coercive steps shall be taken by the 2nd Respondent with regard to the petitioners Shop Nos. 11 and 12 at Manikundu, Dindigul Town, Dindigul-2. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, SGP (R1) : Mr.J.Lawrance (R2) O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by M.DHANDAPANI, J.) Though the matter has been listed under the caption "for dismissal", there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called today. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending indefinitely. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.4648 of 2022
2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[M.D.I.,J.] & [N.D.K.,J.] 20.08.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes PKN To
1. The District Collector, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai.
2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Illuppur, Pudukkottai District.
3. The Tahsildar, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukkottai District.
4. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai, Pudukkottai District.
5. The Inspector of Police, Ponnamaravathi Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P(MD)No.4648 of 2022 M.DHANDAPANI
, J.
and N.DILIP KUMAR, J. PKN W.P(MD)No.4648 of 2022 20.08.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis