Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2022 DAILYLAW 529 (UTT)

RAJESH KAKKAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/143/2022 · 2026-06-09

Alok Mahra

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 143 of 2022 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Suraiya Naaz, learned counsel, holding brief of Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned A.G.A. and Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for the complainant. 4. Today, learned State Counsel would submit that chargesheet has been filed and nothing survives in the matter. As such the matter has become infructuous. 5. Since, chargesheet has been filed and the matter has become infructuous, the present writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Alok Mahra J.) 09.06.2026 Ujjwal