Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 5267 (MAD)

S.Gomathy v. The Agriculture Production Commissioner and secretary

WP/5572/2022 · 2026-08-13

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 5572 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 5572 of 2022 S.Gomathy, W/o. M.C.T.Nainar, No. 2, Bharathi Cross Street, Srinivasa Nagar, Perungulathur, Chennai 600 063. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Agriculture Production Commissioner and Secretary, Secretariat, Chenani 600 009. 2. The Director of Agriculture Chepauk, Chennai 600 005 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2nd respondent in Lr. No. PAUB1/124252/2020 dated 29.04.2021 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 12.12.2020 afresh after giving opportunity to the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Naraayanaswamy For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Sivalingam Government Advocate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5572 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The present writ petition has been filed only upon the limited ground that inspite of the order dated 09.02.2021 in WP No.2702 of 2021, the respondent authority has passed the order without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and on that premise, they challenged the impugned order dated 29.04.2021. 2. At this juncture, the learned Government Advocate brought to the knowledge of this Court about the subsequent order dated 12.07.2024 under letter No.9378/AAI/2021-13. 3. In the above proceedings, learned Government Advocate invited the attention of this Court about para 4 wherein i.e. there is a reference about the opportunity of personal hearing given to the petitioner. In such view of the subsequent development, this Court is of the firm view that the present writ petition is not maintainable and hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is given liberty to challenge the order dated 12.07.2024 in letter No.9378/AAI/2021-13 if he has got any grievance over the same. No costs. 13-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MTL https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5572 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. The Agriculture Production Commissioner and Secretary, Secretariat, Chenani 600 009. 2. The Director of Agriculture Chepauk, Chennai 600 005 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 5572 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. MTL WP No. 5572 of 2022 13-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis