Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 5094 (MAD)

K.Devika v. K.Kanniappan

CONT P/1739/2022 · 2026-07-09

G Arul Murugan

Civil Appealbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Cont.P.No.1739 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09.07.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Cont.P.No.1739 of 2022 K.Devika D/o. Chockalingam 1/120, Thiru Vi. Ka. Street, Manimangalam Village, Kanchipuram - 601 301. Petitioner(s) Vs K.Kanniappan S/o. Kaliappa Gramani 49, Pandara Street, Venkatapuram Village, Kundrathur, Chennai - 600 069. Contemnor(s) Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, seeking to punish the Respondent for his wilful disobedience and breach of the undertaking given before this Hon'ble Court in C.M.A.No.1825 of 2003 dated 24.03.2008. For Petitioner(s): Mr. A.Ganesan For Contemnor(s): Mr.K.Shanmugakani for R1 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1739 of 2022 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.Arul Murugan,J) This contempt petition is filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 24.03.2008 passed in W.A.No.1825 of 2003. 2. Today, when the contempt petition is taken up for hearing, it is fairly submitted by counsel for both parties that as against the order passed in C.M.A.Nos.1824 and 1825 of 2023, SLP has been preferred and the civil appeal is pending. 3. In view of the above, the contempt petition is closed, giving liberty to petitioner to file fresh application as and when the civil appeal is decided. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 09.07.2026 kpl __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1739 of 2022 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (kpl) Cont.P.No.1739 of 2022 09.07.2026 __________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis