RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DISTT. UDHAM SINGH NAGAR
WPCRL/2343/2022 · 2026-02-24
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 507 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 507 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No.
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPCRL NO. 2343 of 2022 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. D.P. Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3.
Learned counsel for the State submits that after thorough investigation now charge sheet has been filed in the present matter, and, as such, the present writ petition is rendered infructuous.
4. In view of the aforesaid statement, the instant writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 24.02.2026 Parul