Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 5062 (MAD)

Abdul Naseer v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/27919/2022 · 2026-06-29

G R Swaminathan, K K Ramakrishnan

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(MD) No. 27919 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 5 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN WP(MD) No. 27919 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)No.21997 of 2022 Abdul Naseer Khan Mohamed, No.14-6-6, Muslim Middle Street, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Theni District, Theni. 2. The Executive Officer Uthamapalayam Town Panchayat, Theni District. 3. The Tahsildar Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. 4. The Assistant Engineer (Electricity) Uthamapalayam Division, Uthamapalayam, Theni District. 5. Beer Mohamed Rep. by his Power Agents A.Sulhan Ibrahim, S/o. Abdul Rajaq, No.14-7-38, Gurukkal Lane, Uthamapalayam, Theni Distirct. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, by directing the Respondents to remove the encroachment put up by the 5th Respondent at 14th Ward, Muslim Middle https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD) No. 27919 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 5 Street, Uthamapalayam, Theni District based on the notice issued by the 2nd Respondent vide his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.361/2020 dated 22.10.2021 within a stipulated period as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): No appearance. For Respondent(s): Mr.M.S.Parthiban, Government Advocate for R-1 to R-3. Mr.s.Deenadhayalan for R-4 No appearance for R-5. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 and the learned Standing counsel appearing for TANGEDO. 2. There is no representation either on the side of the writ petitioner or the private respondent herein. 3. The writ petitioner alleges that the private respondent had encroached the petition mentioned street. If that be so, it is the duty of the second respondent to remove the same by adopting due process of law. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (G.R.S.,J.) (K.K.R.K.,J.) 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD) No. 27919 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 5 To : 1. The District Collector Theni District, Theni. 2. The Executive Officer Uthamapalayam Town Panchayat, Theni District. 3. The Tahsildar Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD) No. 27919 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 5 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. PMU WP(MD) No. 27919 of 2022 29-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD) No. 27919 of 2022 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis