Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 5052 (MAD)

M.Suresh v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/28067/2022 · 2026-06-29

G R Swaminathan, K K Ramakrishnan

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(MD) No. 28067 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 5 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 29-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN WP(MD) No. 28067 of 2022 M.Suresh S/o.T.Murugan (Late), 4/529, Thuvarambadu, Ittamozhi, Thisiyanvilai Taluk, Tirunelveli District - 627 652. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District 2. The Sub Collector Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District 3. The Tahsildar Thisiyanvilai, Tirunelveli District 4. T.Perumal S/o.Thangavel, No.138, Melatheru, Sankarankudiyiruppu, Sathankulam Taluk, Tuticorin District. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 3 herein to remove the illegal encroachment made by the 4th respondent herein on the public pathway at Sy.Nos.734/5 and 735/2 in Thuvarambadu, Vijayanarayanam Part III Revenue Village, Sangankulam Panchayat, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD) No. 28067 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 5 Thisiyanvilai Taluk, Tirunelveli District by considering the petitioner’s representation dated 06.09.2021. For Petitioner(s): M/s.A.Ajith Geethan For Respondent(s): Mr.P.Rajagopalan, Government Advocate for R-1 to R-3. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. 2. The name of the fourth respondent is printed in the cause list. However, he has not chosen to enter appearance. 3. The petitioner states that in the petition mentioned pathway, the fourth respondent has committed encroachment and that it has to be removed. 4. No exception can be taken to the said request. The learned Government Advocate admits that both the survey numbers have been classified as street. He further would further claim that though the encroachment made by the fourth respondent was removed earlier, he is committing encroachment once again. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD) No. 28067 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 5 5. We do not expect the authorities to be so helpless in the matter. They need to take steps against the fourth respondent to ensure that the petition mentioned street is kept from free of encroachment for all times to come. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands allowed. No costs. (G.R.S.,J.) (K.K.R.K.,J.) 29-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No PMU To: 1. The District Collector Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District 2. The Sub Collector Cheranmahadevi, Tirunelveli District 3. The Tahsildar Thisiyanvilai, Tirunelveli District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD) No. 28067 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 5 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J. PMU WP(MD) No. 28067 of 2022 29-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP(MD) No. 28067 of 2022 __________ Page5 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis