SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.676 of 2022 Smt.. Ramneek Sharma ……….Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …..Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner (appeared through V.C.). 2. Ms. Swati Verma and Mr. Bhupendra Koranga, learned Brief Holders for the State. 3. Mr. D.C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the caveator. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has rendered infructuous due to efflux of time. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 06.04.2026 AK