Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4934 (MAD)

N.BALAJI v. Dr.K.J.Renuka

CMP/10379/2022 · 2026-06-22

K Govindarajan Thilakavadi, P Velmurugan

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No. 10379 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI CMP No. 10379 of 2022 IN OSA NO. 307 OF 2021 N.Balaji S/o.Mr.A.K.Nandagopal, New No.41 (O.No.19) Kavarai Street, West Saidapet, Chennai-600015 ..Appellant(s) Vs 1. Dr.K.J.Renuka W/o.B.Sasikumar, Old No.17, New No.33, Perumal Koil Street, Saidapet West, Chennai-600015 2. M.Srinivasan S/o.Late S.Mohana Krishna Chettiar, Old No.16, New No.35, Ranghabashyam Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015 3. Sri Prasanna Venkata Narasimha Perumal Temple Rep. by its Managing Trustees, S. Manohar Chettiar, Perumal Koil Street, Saidapet West, Chennai-600015 4. S.Manohar Chettiar S/o.T.Srinivasan, Managing Trustee, Sri Prasanna Venkata Narasimha Perumal Temple, Perumal Koil Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015 5. A.Madhanagopal Chettiar S/o.A.Adhi Chetty, Trustee, Sri Prasanna Venkata Narasimha Perumal Temple, Perumal Koil Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 10379 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 6. D.Rajasekaran Chettiar S/o.Late Deenadayalan, Trustee, Sri Prasanna Venkata Narasimha Perumal Temple, Perumal Koil Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015 7. K.R.Prabhakar Chettiar S/o.Late K.R.Ranganathan, Trustee, Sri Prasanna Venkata Narasimha Perumal Temple, Perumal Koil Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015 8. E.P.Parthasarathy S/o.Late E.Padmanabhan, Trustee, Sri Prasanna Venkata Narasimha Perumal Temple, Perumal Koil Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600015 ..Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.B.JAYANTHI For Respondent(s): Mr.Vineet Subramani for R1 & R2 Mr.P.Satheesh Kumar for R3 to R5 Mr.L.Damodharan for R6 & R7 Mr.S.Senthilnathan for R8 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by P.Velmurugan J.) This Petition has been filed to implead the petitioner as the seventh respondent in the above Appeal. 2. The petitioner has stated in his affidavit that he is one of the devotees of the said temple. Therefore, no prejudice would be caused to the appellants, if the petitioner is allowed to be impleaded as a party in the appeal. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 10379 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 3. In view of the above, this Petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the appeal. (P.V.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 22-06-2026 GSK https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 10379 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 P.VELMURUGAN, J. AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J. GSK CMP No. 10379 of 2022 IN OSA NO. 307 OF 2021 22-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis