Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4875 (MAD)

V. Elangovan, v. V. Amirthamani,

SA(MD)/712/2022 · 2026-06-12

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SA(MD). No.712 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 12.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI SA(MD). No.712 of 2022 and CMP(MD)No.10673 of 2022 1. V. Elangovan 2. M. Loganathan ... Appellants / Appellants/ Plaintiffs Vs. 1. V. Amirthamani 2. R. Menaka 3. P. Pappathi 4. P. Mohan 5. R. Loganathan ... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants PRAYER :- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 05.07.2016 in A.S. No. 32 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Karur in reversing the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2012 made in O.S. No. 361 of 2010 on the file of Ist Additional Sub court, Karur. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA(MD). No.712 of 2022 For Appellants : Mr.K.Govindarajan, For Respondents : Mr.V.Balaji JUDGMENT The suit for partition, recovery of possession and permanent injunction in O.S.No.361 of 2010 was dismissed by the Principal Sub Court and was affirmed in first appeal in A.S.No.32 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Karur, aggrieved by the concurrent findings, the present second appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs. 2. Pending the second appeal, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and in view of the unsuccessful claims as well, the plaintiffs have been adequately compensated by the compensated and a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- has been paid in full quit and the joint compromise memo, dated 08.04.2026 is duly signed by all the parties and their respective counsel, is presented for approval. 3. The parties are also present in person. The plaintiffs admit the factum of receipt of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) in full and final settlement of all the claims, though unsuccessful, before the Court 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA(MD). No.712 of 2022 below and have no objection for the second appeal being dismissed, recording the compromise. The respondents are also present and affirm the said compromise as well. 4. In view of the above, recording the joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026, the second appeal is dismissed. The joint compromise memo, dated 08.04.2026, shall form part of the decree. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 12.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No LS TO 1. The Principal District Judge, Karur. 2. The Ist Additional Sub Court, Karur. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA(MD). No.712 of 2022 P.B.BALAJI,J. LS SA(MD) No.712 of 2022 12.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis