Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4838 (MAD)

K.Susila v. The Administrator

WP/29074/2022 · 2026-06-09

K Surender

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 29074 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 29074 of 2022 K.Susila W/o. Kalidass, No. 2/200 Hospital street, Parasalur, Tharangambadi taluk, Mayiladuthurai District ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Administrator ZB 102, Mayuram Co-operative Housing Society Limited M.Z. Plaza Pallakarai Mayiladuthurai 609 001 2. The Regional Deputy Registrar (Housing) Co operative Department No. 7, Daniel Thomas Nagar Thanjavur 613 007 3. Tamil Nadu Co-operative Housing Federation Rep by its Additional Registrar / Managing Director 48, Ritherdon Road, Veppery chennai 600 007 ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the respondents 1 to 3 to return the original documents pledged by the petitioner before the 1st respondent in loan No. 670 pursuant to the Credit Receipt dted 25.11.2008 along with adequate compensation for the delay based on the petitioner representation dated 07.02.2017 within the time frame fixed by this honble Court For Petitioner(s): MR.R.SHIVAKUMAR FOR K.M.Vijayan Associates https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29074 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Chakkaravarthy For R1 And R2 Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai for R3 Order This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to return the original documents pledged by the petitioner before the 1st respondent in loan No.670, pursuant to the Credit Receipt dated 25.11.2008 along with adequate compensation for the delay based on the petitioner representation dated 07.02.2017, within the time frame fixed by this Court. 2. The case of the petitioner is the petitioner availed loan from the 1st respondent Society by pledging the original documents of the petitioner's property. After settlement of the said loan, no due certificate was issued by the 1st respondent. Despite repeated representations, the respondents failed to return to original documents pledged by the petitioner and hence, the present writ petition. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials on record. 4. Considering the limited scope of prayer sought for, this Court, without expressing anything on merits, directs the respondents to consider and dispose https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29074 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 of the petitioner's representation dated 07.02.2017 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. No costs. 09-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No MTL To 1. The Administrator ZB 102, Mayuram Co-operative Housing Society Limited M.Z. Plaza Pallakarai Mayiladuthurai 609 001 2. The Regional Deputy Registrar (Housing) Co operative Department No. 7, Daniel Thomas Nagar Thanjavur 613 007 3. Tamil Nadu Co-operative Housing Federation Rep by its Additional Registrar / Managing Director 48, Ritherdon Road, Veppery chennai 600 007 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 29074 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 K.SURENDER J. MTL WP No. 29074 of 2022 09-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis