WP No. 32652 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 32652 of 2022 M/s.Suryadev Alloys and Power Private Limited, rep. by its Authorised Signatory R.Balaji, Isana Building 8th floor, No.497 and 498 P.H.Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai 600106. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600005. 2. The District Collector Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Ponneri, Tiruvallur District. 4. The Tahsildar Gummidipoondi Taluk, Gummidipoondi , Tiruvallur District. 5. V.Munusamy S/o.Late Veerasamy Naicker, Thandalacherry Village, Tiruvallur District. ..Respondent(s) Directing the 1st and 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners representations dated 06.09.2011, 18.10.2011, 27.11.2013, 02.02.2015, 28.09.2021 and 18.10.2021, for giving alternative lands measuring 10.49 acres comprised in S.No. 291/2 - 0.14. ares, 292/2 0.03.5 ares at Gummidipoondi Village, S.No. 78/3 - 0.03. ares, 86 - 0.14.5 ares, 93/2 - 0.30 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32652 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 ares, 94/1 - 1.88 hectare, 96/1 - 0.18 ares, 97-41.5 ares, 100/2B - 39.5 ares, 104-0.2 ares, 105-0.16 ares at Sirupuzhalpettai village and S.No. 31-0.73 ares at Thanalacheri Village, till then forbearing the 4th respondent from interfering with the petitioners right to property and to carry on lawful business in and over the said property. WP No. 32652 of 2022 For Petitioner(s): Mr.N.Manoharan for Mr.P.Krishnan For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Arun Kumar, Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 to R4 No appearance for R5 Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the application submitted by the petitioner to accept the alternate land offered by the petitioner in lieu of the land under his occupation, is pending before the Government. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that as far as water body portion is concerned, the claim of the petitioner is rejected, since the water body cannot be alienated or exchanged. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that lease has been granted in favour of the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32652 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Be that as it may. The application submitted by the petitioner is under consideration. Thus, the petitioner is at liberty to pursue the matter before the competent authority. 5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 20-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VSI To 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 600005. 2. The District Collector Tiruvallur District, Tiruvallur. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Ponneri, Tiruvallur District. 4. The Tahsildar Gummidipoondi Taluk, Gummidipoondi , Tiruvallur District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 32652 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.SURENDER J. VSI WP No. 32652 of 2022 20-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis