Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4294 (MAD)

Roselin Mary v. The Accountant General of Tami lNadu

WP/19054/2022 · 2026-03-06

Mohammed Shaffiq

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 19054 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 19054 of 2022 Roselin Mary W/o.Mr.P.S.Arockiasamy 3 / 112, E Type 28th Street, Sidco Nagar, Villivakkam, Chennai- 600 049. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Accountant General of Tami lNadu Teynampet, Chennai- 600 018. 2. AGs office (Audit) Complex 361, Anna Salai, Rostrevor Garden, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. 3. Pay and Accounts Office (South) No.485, MTB building. Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035. ..Respondent(s) Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the Respondent to consider the representation dated 24 / 02 / 2022 and further direct the Respondent to sanction petitioner fathers family pension to petitioner mentally disordered sister Mrs. Deenal Elizabeth For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Madhuprakash For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Muralikrishnan for R1 & R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19054 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed praying a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 24.02.2022 whereby the petitioner had requested for grant of family pension to Mrs. Deenal Elizabeth who according to the petitioner suffers from Schizopherenia. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the representation itself is insufficient / inadequate in as much as relevant medical certificates and documents have not been furnished and prima facie the petitioner may not be entitled to any family pension. Having said that the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner may submit a fresh representation along with supporting documents, if any, and on such representation being made, the same would be considered and orders would be passed, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. 3. In view of the above submission by the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would file a fresh representation to the respondents 1 and 2 along with supporting documents, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19054 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Recording the above submissions, this Writ Petition is closed. No costs. 06-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No BKN To: 1. The Accountant General of Tami lNadu Theynampet, Chennai- 600 018. 2. AGs office (Audit) Complex 361, Anna Salai, Rostrevor Garden, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 19054 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. BKN WP No. 19054 of 2022 06-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis