Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4246 (MAD)

Dr.Sujatha Samuel v. The Director

WP/12678/2022 · 2026-03-17

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 12678 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 12678 of 2022 Dr.Sujatha Samuel, W/o. Dr. Samuel Amirtharaj, Pushpa Hospital, Coonoor, The Nilgiris. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The Director, Documentation Section, Tamilnadu Forensic Laboratory, Mylapore, Chennai 06. 2.The Deputy Director, Documentation Section, Tamilnadu Forensic Laboratory, Mylapore, Chennai 06. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to appoint a qualified Graphologist to examine and compare thee truthness of the signature in the forged promissory note filed in O.S.No. 339 / 2002 pending on the file of Learned I Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore and submit the report to the Learned I Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12678 of 2022 For Petitioner: For Respondent(s): No Appearance Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent to appoint a qualified Graphologist to examine and compare the truthness of the signature in the forged promissory note filed in O.S.No. 339 / 2002 pending on the file of Learned I Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore and submit the report to the Learned I Additional Subordinate Court, Coimbatore. 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3.Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that already an Advocate Commissioner was appointed to collect the report and the documents. The qualified Document Experts of the respondent department examined the disputed signatures and an opinion was handed over to the Advocate Commissioner on 06.07.2022 itself and that would be the reason for non-appearance of the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12678 of 2022 4.The submissions made by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents is recorded. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 17-03-2026 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Director, Documentation Section, Tamilnadu Forensic Laboratory, Mylapore, Chennai 06. 2.The Deputy Director, Documentation Section, Tamilnadu Forensic Laboratory, Mylapore, Chennai 06. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 12678 of 2022 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst WP No. 12678 of 2022 17-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis