Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4162 (MAD)

T.Vasanth Kumar v. The District collector

WP/35237/2022 · 2026-03-11

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 35237 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 35237 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 34699 OF 2022 T.Vasanth Kumar S/o. late Thangavel Saminaikanpatti Village Kottagoundenpatti Po Omalur Slem District Tamil Nadu Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District collector Salem District 2.The Revenue Division officer Revenue Divisional office, mettur, Salem District 3.The Thasildar Omalur Taluk, omalur Salem District Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, Direct the Respondent to invoke the proper legal procedure in the event of the respondent intends to secure the petitioners land in survey No. 46/2 to an extent of 3.20 acres in saminaickenpatti village Omalur Taluk, Salem District in invoke of land acquisition laws or any statutory procedures and to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to make adequate objections within a time frame as may be fixed by this honble Court For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Vedachalam For Respondent(s): Govt. Advocate For Respondents R1 To R3 - Court Notice Served. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35237 of 2022 ORDER This writ petition has been filed to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.05.2017. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner has given a representation dated 23.05.2017 requesting the respondent to invoke the proper legal procedure in the event of the respondent intends to secure the petitioner’s land in survey No. 46/2 to an extent of 3.20 acres in saminaickenpatti village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District in invoke of land acquisition laws or any statutory procedures and to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to make adequate objections. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition. 3. In reply, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the petitioner's representation will be disposed of by the respondent within a period of 12 weeks. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35237 of 2022 5. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner's representation was filed as early as in the year 2017. In such case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondents. In such case, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation. 6. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost. 11-03-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The District collector Salem District 2.The Revenue Division officer Revenue Divisional office, mettur, Salem District 3.The Thasildar Omalur Taluk, omalur Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 35237 of 2022 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 35237 of 2022 11-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis