Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4136 (MAD)

MARIAPPAN.M v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP(MD)/4140/2022 · 2026-04-07

G R Swaminathan, R Poornima

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.4140 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.POORNIMA W.P(MD)No.4140 of 2022 and W.M.P(MD)No.3553 of 2022 M.Mariappan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 2.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Watrap, Watrap Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3.The President, S.Ramachandrapuram Village Panchayat, S.Ramachandrapuram Village, Watrap Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 4.P.Tamilselvam (R.4 is impleaded vide order of this Court dated 07.04.2025 in W.M.P(MD)No.22251 of 2022) ... Respondents 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.4140 of 2022 Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order in proceedings in eviction notice dated 28.02.2022 on the file of third respondent herein and to set aside the same and directing the third respondent respect herein, not to disturb the petitioner's residential house in respect of the Survey No.1280/1 Ward No.2 (now it comprised as Survey No.1853/14 and 1853/15) in S.Ramachandrapuram Village, Sundarapandiam Revenue Village, Watrap Taluk and Virudhunagar District. For Petitioner : Ms.G.Dhanalakshmi For Respondents : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh Additional Government Pleader for R.1 to R.3 Mr.P.Mahendran for R.4 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides. 2.By the impugned Communication dated 28.02.2022, the President of S.Ramachandrapuram Village Panchayat had called upon the petitioner to remove the encroachment in question. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.4140 of 2022 3.It is well settled that the President of a local body cannot coercively enforce his own order. If the petitioner fails to comply with the demand set out in the impugned notice, the President of the local body has to necessarily approach the jurisdictional Tahsildar to take action under the Land Encroachment Act. As and when proceedings are taken under the said Act, the petitioner is at liberty to place all his defences before the concerned authority. 4.With the aforesaid clarification, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [G.R.S., J.] [R.P, J.] 07.04.2026 2/3 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No MGA To 1.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.4140 of 2022 2.The Block Development Officer (Village Panchayat), Watrap, Watrap Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 3.The President, S.Ramachandrapuram Village Panchayat, S.Ramachandrapuram Village, Watrap Taluk, Virudhunagar District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.4140 of 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J. AND R.POORNIMA , J. MGA W.P(MD)No.4140 of 2022 07.04.2026 2/3 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis