Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4106 (MAD)

Sri Vinayaga Bankers v. Banking Ombudsman (NBFCS)

WP/9733/2022 · 2026-03-03

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 9733 of 2022 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 9733 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 9448 OF 2022 Sri Vinayaga Bankers Rep by its Proprietor M. Mohan, No.136-6, Sankari Main Road, Nethimedu, Salem District- 636 002. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Banking Ombudsman (NBFCS) Reserve Bank of India, 6, Rajaji Road,Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 001. 2. The Chief Manager City Union Bank Ltd, Salem main Branch, Salem. 3. The Authorised officer, City Union Bank Ltd, Salem Main Branch, Salem. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 1st respondent made in Web Communication N202122023089982 / 2021 - 2022 dated 01/ 04/ 2022 and quash the same and consequently directing the 1st Respondent to take up the complaint dated 20.01.2022 having Ref. No N202122023089982 filed by the petitioner against the 2nd respondent on file once against and deal with the complaint in accordance with law by following the Principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9733 of 2022 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Vinoth (given change of vakalat) For Respondent(s): Ms.K.Jayaganga for Ms.Ananda Gomathy for R2 & R3 No appearance for R1 Order This Writ Petition has been filed to call for the records of the 1st respondent made in Web Communication N202122023089982 / 2021 - 2022 dated 01/ 04/ 2022 and quash the same and consequently directing the 1st respondent to take up the complaint dated 20.01.2022 having Ref. No N202122023089982 filed by the petitioner against the 2nd respondent. 2. Mr.G.Vinoth, learned counsel on record for the petitioner would submit that he has given change of vakalat for the petitioner. 3. However, till date, the petitioner has not taken any steps to engage a counsel to represent his case. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 03-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gsk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9733 of 2022 __________ Page3 of 4 To 1. Banking Ombudsman (NBFCS) Reserve Bank of India, 6, Rajaji Road,Fort St. George, Chennai- 600 001. 2. The Chief Manager City Union Bank Ltd, Salem main Branch, Salem. 3. The Authorised officer City union Bank Ltd, Salem Main Branch, Salem. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9733 of 2022 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. GSK WP No. 9733 of 2022 AND WMP NO. 9448 OF 2022 03-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis