Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 4083 (MAD)

S.P.Ramasamy v. The Revenue Divisional officer

WP/34799/2022 · 2026-04-24

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 34799 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-04-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 34799 of 2022 S.P.Ramasamy S/o. Palaniappagounder, New No. 3/29A, Old No. 3/124, Vadakkukadu Pattanam Muniappampallayam Village, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Revenue Divisional officer Namakkal. 2.The Thasildar, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. 3.J. GanasakthiJagadesan, W/o. Jagadesan, D. No. 8/31, Atthanurpudur, Athanur Post, Rasipuram Taluk,Namakkal District. 4.S.R. Rathinamala, w/o. K.R. Rajkumar, D. No. 1/72-A,Aayeepalayam, Athanur Post, Rasipuram Taluk,Namakkal District. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order Mu.Mu. No. 9373/2022/A6 dated 17.11.2022 of the 1st respondent and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34799 of 2022 quash the same as illegal and void without any jurisdiction, consequently direct the 2nd respondent to be transfer the patta in name of original owner within a time to be stipulated by this court For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 & 2 Mr.A.Arunbabu for R3 & 4 ORDER This writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 17.11.2022 passed by the 1st respondent. 2. When this matter was listed before this Court on 17.04.2026, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that he has not instructions from the petitioner and hence, he prayed this Court to delete his name from the cause list. 3. Even today, neither the petitioner nor any other counsel representing the petitioner had appeared before this Court. 4. In view of the above, it appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the present case. In such case, this Court is not inclined to keep this matter pending. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34799 of 2022 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 24-04-2026 nsa Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Revenue Divisional officer Namakkal. 2.The Thasildar, Rasipuram Taluk, Namakkal District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 34799 of 2022 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. nsa WP No. 34799 of 2022 24-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis