WP No. 8343 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 8343 of 2022 R.Puthuran, S/o. Rangasamy, No. 555, Pillar Kovil Street, Nandhimangalam Village, Padiagraharam, Thiruvannamalai. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.The State rep by, The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District. 2.The District Manager, District Manager Office, Tamil Nadu Adhi Dharavidar Housing Development Corporation (TAHDCO), Thiruvannamalai. 3.The Branch Manager, Union Bank, Puthuupalayam Branch, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 3rd respondent to consider petitioner’s representation on 04.02.2022 and disburse loan to him as per nodel order No. Na.Ka.No. TAHDCO- 2020-21- LD-TM- 8 on 21.11.2020 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8343 of 2022 issued by 2nd respondent under Tamil Nadu Adhi Dharavidar Housing Development Corporation (TAHDCO) scheme within the time prescribed by this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Karthik For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate For R1 And 2. Mr. S.Parthasarathy, For R3 ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking to direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 04.02.2022 and disburse loan to him as per nodel order No. Na.Ka.No. TAHDCO- 2020-21- LD-TM- 8 on 21.11.2020 issued by 2nd respondent under Tamil Nadu Adhi Dharavidar Housing Development Corporation (TAHDCO) scheme, within the time prescribed by this Court. 2.Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent 1 and 2 would submit that the representation of the petitioner has been considered and disposed of by the 2nd respondent vide proceedings dated 05.05.2022 and he has also produced the said proceedings dated 05.05.2022 passed by the 2nd respondent, before this Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8343 of 2022 3.Upon hearing the submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, it is evident that the representation of the petitioner regarding the disbursement of loan has been considered and same has been rejected by the 2nd respondent. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in the present case. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to challenge the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 05.05.2022. 4.With the above observation, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. 03-03-2026 rst Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The District Collector, Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District. 2.The District Manager, District Manager Office, Tamil Nadu Adhi Dharavidar Housing Development Corporation (TAHDCO), Thiruvannamalai. 3.The Branch Manager Union Bank, Puthuupalayam Branch, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8343 of 2022 Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8343 of 2022 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J. rst WP No. 8343 of 2022 03-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis