Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 3257 (BOM)

ANJANABAI TUKARAM PAWAR (DIED) LRS MITRAVANDABAI (DIED) THR LRS GUNABAI (DIED) LRS HARIDAS AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, LATUR AND OTHERS

CA/7881/2022 · 2026-09-11

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 915 CA 7881 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7881 OF 2022 IN FAST/33259/2019 ANJANABAI TUKARAM PAWAR (DIED) LRS MITRAVANDABAI (DIED) THR LRS GUNABAI (DIED) LRS HARIDAS AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, LATUR AND OTHERS ... Mr. R. K. Ashtekar, Advocate for Applicants Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for Respondent-State … CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. DATED : 11th September 2026 P.C. :- . Heard Mr. R. K. Ashtekar, learned Advocate for the applicants. 2. The learned Advocate for the applicants submits that the registration of the First Appeal was refused on account of failure of the appellant to remove office objections within the stipulated time. The present application is filed seeking restoration of the First Appeal by quashing and setting aside the said order of dismissal. He further submits that due to an oversight, the matter could not be noticed which resulted in 2026:BHC-AUG:42220 2 915 CA 7881 OF 2022 the order of dismissal. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The delay, if any, caused in filing the application stands condoned. 4. The order dated 04.01.2022 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court is hereby quashed and set aside. 5. The First Appeal is restored to its original position, provided that the appellant shall remove all office objections within a period of four weeks from today. 6. It is made clear that if the office objections are not removed within the stipulated period, this order shall automatically lose its effect. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) PRW