Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 3246 (BOM)

RAHUL PRABHAKAR BAGUL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/920/2022 · 2026-09-10

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

920.22WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 920 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 920 OF 2022 RAHUL PRABHAKAR BAGUL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Adv. Netra M. Bhise h/f. Mr.N.L.Choudhari APP for Respondent-State : Mrs.M.N.Ghanekar … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 10.09.2026 P.C. : 1] Though Advocate Netra M. Bhise holding for Mr.N.L.Choudhari, learned counsel seeks an adjournment on the ground of non-availability of Advocate Mr.N.L.Choudhari, but the petition indicates that the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondent nos. 2 to 4 to register crime against respondent nos. 5 to 13 in view of his complaint dated 09.02.2022 lodged in Azad Nagar Police Station, Dhule. However, as per the report of the Resource Personnel of this Court, the rival parties have amicably settled the matter and the order dated 15.04.2023 passed below Exh. 1 in PWDVA 2026:BHC-AUG:42247-DB 920.22WP 2 No.75 of 2021 confirms the said settlement. The said order is also annexed to the report. 2] In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and the same stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC