ISLAM HOQUE CHOUDHURY v. THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS.
Crl.Petn./64/2022 · 2026-08-14
Revati Mohite Dere
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 324 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 324 (MEG) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
Crl.Petn. No. 64 of 2022 Date of order: 14.08.2026
Islam Hoque Choudhury ...Petitioner - versus -
1. The State of Meghalaya duly represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. Officer-in-charge, Phulbari Police Station, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
3. I/C District School Education Officer (Informant/ Complainant) West Garo Hills, Tura, Meghalaya.
4. Abdus Salam Sk. ...Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice
Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. H.L. Shangreiso, Sr. Adv. with
Mr. T. Dkhar, Adv.
For the Respondents : Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG with
Ms R. Colney, GA [R1-3]
Ms. M. Rahman, Adv. [R4]
i) Whether approved for No
reporting in Law journals etc.:
ii) Whether approved for publication No
in press:
Serial No. 02 Supplementary List 2026:MLHC:887
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) (Oral)
By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR dated 09.04.2021 registered with the Phulbari Police Station and consequently, the charge-sheet filed in the said FIR and also the criminal proceeding, i.e., GR Case No. 40 of 2022 pending before the JMFC, West Garo Hills.
2. Mr. N.D. Chullai, learned AAG, on instructions submits that the petitioner has also filed a criminal revision application, being Criminal Revision No. 5 of 2025 before the learned Sessions Judge at Tura against the order dismissing the petitioner’s application seeking his discharge from the said case and the revision application is pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Tura.
3. In this view of the matter, since the revision application, filed by the petitioner is pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Tura, this Court is not inclined to entertain the aforesaid petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.
2026:MLHC:887
4. Needless to state that, the learned Sessions Judge to decide the pending revision application on its own merits uninfluenced by the disposal of the aforesaid petition. It is made clear that this petition is being disposed of only having regard to the fact, that the petitioner has filed a revision application, which is pending for hearing before the learned Sessions Judge, Tura.
5. Needless also to state that, all contentions of all parties are kept open.
6. The petition is, accordingly disposed of.
7. All parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.
(Revati Mohite Dere)
Chief Justice
2026:MLHC:887 Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2026.08.14 19:27:06 IST