Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
946 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17074 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 946 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 17074 OF 2022 IN FCAST/30014/2022 Babita @laxmi W/o. Sunil Bhoi Versus Sunil Dasharath Bhoi __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Anita V. Veer h/f. Adv. Dhananjay A Naik, for Applicant - Wife __________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026 PER COURT : 1) Learned advocate Ms. Veer, holding for Mr. Naik,
learned counsel for the Applicant - Wife, submits that the report of the Bailiff clearly indicates that the Respondent - Husband has refused to accept the notice. 2) In view of the same, the notice is deemed to have been served. However, none appeared on behalf of the Respondent - Husband. 3) For the reasons recorded in the application, the delay of 80 days in filing the Family Court Appeal stands condoned. The Application is accordingly disposed of. 4) The appeal filed by the Applicant - Wife be registered after removal of all the office objections.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:41903-DB