Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 3198 (BOM)

KISHOR S/O BABULAL SHRIVASTAV v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS SECRETARY, RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS

WP/8103/2022 · 2026-09-08

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 4wp8103.22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.8103/2022 Kishor Babulal Shrivastav .Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr. S. S. Shingne, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N. R. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Mr. U. J. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 8, 2026. On 13.08.2025, following order was passed: “1. Learned AGP informed that the petitioner has been given further opportunity of hearing and accordingly they are in process to consider the pension claim of the petitioner and seeks time in the matter. 2. Accordingly, two weeks time is granted with a clear understanding that no further time will be granted in the matter as the matter pertains to the pensionary benefits of the petitioner. 3. Stand over to 29th August, 2025.” 2. In response, learned A.G.P. and learned counsel for respondent No.2 makes a statement, on instructions, that pensionary benefits will be released to the petitioner within a short time. 3. The statement is accepted. 4. The purpose of filing the petition is thus served. The petition is accordingly disposed of. 5. So far as the issue of interest is concerned, counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled to interest for the delayed payment in terms of section 129-B of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. 6. If that be so, pensionary benefits as would be released, shall include the interest component as well. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kahale Signed by: Kahale Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 09/09/2026 10:27:27