CHANDRAKANT GHELANI AND ANR. v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
WP/300/2022 · 2026-09-01
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 3157 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 3157 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
23.WP.300.2022.doc HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)
IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.300 OF 2022 Chandrakant Ghelani And Anr. .. Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents .................... Ms. Pragya, Advocate i/by Ms. Dhruvika Bhayani for Petitioners. Ms. Anuja S. Gotad, APP for Respondent No.1 – State. Mr. Kaushal Popat a/w. Mr. Chetan Pawar, Advocates i/by White & Brief for Respondent No.2. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 01, 2026 P.C.
:
1. Heard Ms. Pragya, learned Advocate for Petitioners; Ms. Gotad, learned APP for Respondent No.1 – State and Mr. Popat, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.
2. Ms. Pragya informs the Court that Petition is rendered infructuous.
3. Therefore Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] 1 of 1 HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Digitally signed by HARSHADA HANUMANT SAWANT Date: 2026.09.01 15:14:41 +0530