MAHAVEER NAGARI SAHAKARI PATHPEDHI MARYADIT CHOPDA, THROUGH ITS MANAGER ACHAL ASHOKLAL AGRAWAL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/1507/2022 · 2026-08-27
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 3149 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 3149 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 923 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1558 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 923 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1558 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1134 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1308 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1507 OF 2022 MAHAVEER NAGARI SAHAKARI PATHPEDHI MARYADIT CHOPDA, THROUGH ITS MANAGER ACHAL ASHOKLAL AGRAWAL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ….. Adv. Yadnyesh V. Dharmadhikari h/f Adv. Ajay G. Talhar, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. A. S. Shinde, APP for Respondents-State …..
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 27/08/2026
Per Court: . Though the learned counsel holding for Mr. Talhar, sought time to take instructions, but it appears that all these petitions are filed by the petitioner-society for registration of crime regarding misappropriation of the funds of the society as per its complaint dated 05.05.2021. However, after filing this matter the petitioner did not remain present and even the notices are also not issued 2026:BHC-AUG:39833-DB
2 923 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1558 OF 2022 against the respondents after filing of these petitions in the year
2020.
2. It is also appearant that the petitioner-society has also not taken care to give instructions to its own Advocate. Therefore, it is clearly evident that the petitioner is not interested in proceeding with the matter.
3. As such, all these petitions stand dismissed for non- prosecution.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/