Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 3139 (BOM)

NAVNATH SAHEBRAO PIMPLE v. RAMESH MANOHAR SURWASE

APPLN/717/2022 · 2026-09-02

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

66.22revn (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 907 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2022 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 717 OF 2022 IN REVN/66/2022 NAVNATH SAHEBRAO PIMPLE VERSUS RAMESH MANOHAR SURWASE ….. Mr M. L. Dharashive, Advocate for Applicant Mr A. M. Reddy, Advocate for Respondent ….. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 02nd SEPTEMBER, 2026 P. C. : 1. Learned Advocate for the applicant submits that, during the pendency of this revision application, applicant Navnath Sahebrao Pimple is expired and this matter has abated against applicant. 2. In view of above, this revision application is disposed of as abated. 3. In view of disposal of revision application, Criminal Application No.717/2022 does not survive and the same is also disposed of. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk 2026:BHC-AUG:40153