41-REVN-282-2022 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 282 OF 2022 Vasant Bhaskar Vispute ...Applicant/s Versus Ashwini Vasant Vispute and anr. ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Mr. A. S. Chandak i/b. Ms. Indrayani Patani and Ms. Niraja Patani (Joshi), Advocate for Applicant. None for the respondents. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 31st AUGUST, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. None for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the application insofar as respondent No.1-wife is concerned. Learned counsel further submitted that, by the impugned order, learned Family Court had directed the applicant to pay maintenance to his wife and to his son, who is 24 years old, employed in a digital multi-marketing company and drawing a salary of 25,000 per month. Learned counsel ₹ submitted that if this Court keeps the contentions of the applicant open insofar as respondent No.1-wife is concerned, appropriate orders may be passed by this Court in respect of the son. SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2026.09.03 12:33:10 +0530 41-REVN-282-2022 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam 3. I have heard learned counsel for the applicant. It appears from the record that the applicant has filed an affidavit dated 11th October 2022 , stating that his son is 24 years old, he is employed in a digital multi- marketing company and drawing a salary of 25,000 per month. ₹ Considering these facts, the son is not entitled to maintenance. Hence, I pass following order: O R D E R a) The revision application is partly allowed in respect of the son of the applicant. b) The order dated 11th May 2016 in M.A.No. 694 of 2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court Room No.7, Nashik, in respect of the son of the applicant is quashed and set aside, as on the date of the order, the son of the applicant was major. c) The order in respect of the wife of the applicant is maintained. d) The contentions of the applicant in respect of the wife are kept open. The revision application is disposed of in above terms. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)