Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 3087 (BOM)

DR. SWAPAN SANTOSH BISWAS v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

WP/1165/2022 · 2026-08-28

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

919-cr.wp.1165.2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 919 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1165 OF 2022 Dr. Swapan Santosh Biswas Versus The Union Of India And Others __________________________________________________________ Adv. Jadhavar Dattatray H. for the Petitioner - Absent Ms. U. S. Bhosale, APP for State Adv. Rohit S. Sarvadnya for Respondent No. 1 - UOI __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1) None appears for the petitioner. 2) Learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for Respondent No.1-UOI submit that the petition is not maintainable. 3) On going through the record, it appears that the petitioner has prayed for permission to practice in Allopathy, Naturopathy, etc. However, the judgment in Criminal Writ Petition No. 385 of 2006 clearly indicates that the petitioner is only permitted to practice Naturopathy. Under such circumstances, the present writ petition is not maintainable. Komal Kamble 2026:BHC-AUG:39480-DB 919-cr.wp.1165.2022 4) Even otherwise, after filing the petition, the petitioner did not care to remain present for removal of the office objections. Criminal Writ Petition, therefore, stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble