HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6207/2022 Seema Meena W/o Kamlesh Meena, R/o Nayabas, Tejala, Tehla, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Omkar Meena S/o Kalyan Sahay Meena, aged about 41 Years, R/o Nayabas, Tejala, Tehla, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Koushal Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta-Asstt.GA. Mr. Sapan Soni JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/05/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No. 119/2022 registered with Police Station Tehla, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Section 376DA and 506 IPC and Section 5(g)/6 of the POCSO Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was having good relations with the prosecutrix and she arrived at the petitioner’s house when she called upon the prosecutirix to come and do some cleaning work. Counsel submits that there is no substance in the allegations that the petitioner closed the door behind the prosecutrix and thereafter, the co-accused allegedly committed rape upon the prosecutrix. Counsel further submits (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6207/2022] that the allegations in the impugned FIR are false and have been levelled on account of prior enmity. Counsel further submits that petitioner is a lady and she has not committed any such act against the prosecutrix. Hence, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR. 3. Per contra, learned Assistant Government Advocate opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submits that there are allegations against the petitioner along with co- accused persons in the impugned FIR and the co-accused persons have faced trial for the offences under Sections 363, 366A, 376 D and 506 IPC and Section 5l/6 of the POCSO Act and they have been found guilty for the above stated offences. Counsel submits that prima facie case is there against her to proceed, hence interference of this Court is not warranted. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. The allegations levelled in the impugned FIR reveals commission of cognizable offence and the correctness of the allegations cannot be examined or adjudicated by this Court while exercising its inherent powers contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C. This Court cannot conduct fishing and roving enquiry to find out the truth behind the allegations as certainly this power lies within the domain of the Investigating Officer. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation along with documents in support of her contentions before the Investigating Officer. It is expected from the (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6207/2022] Investigating Officer to consider the same and submit the conclusion report of investigation under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the Competent Court strictly in accordance with law. 7. In view of the above, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all other application(s), pending, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/6