CWP-30075 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 Akant State of Haryana and CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. impugned order dated issuance of a writ in the nature of consider the claim of the petitioner under BCA Category for the post of Veterinary Surgeon in Animal Husbandry and Dairying Haryana against Advt. No. 41/2022 dated read with Corrigendum da the sequel of the facts mentioned and also for issuance of a direction to the respondents to keep one post reserve of Veterinary Surgeon. 2. fairly submitted that in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in J&K Public Service Commission vs. 30075-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Versus State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Naveen Jhajolia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana Mr. Gurnoor S. Sandhu, Advocate for respondent No. 2-HPSC. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present writ petition is impugned order dated 30.09.2024 (Annexure P issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus consider the claim of the petitioner under BCA Category for the post of Veterinary Surgeon in Animal Husbandry and Dairying Haryana against Advt. No. 41/2022 dated read with Corrigendum dated 22.02.2024 (Annexure P the sequel of the facts mentioned and also for issuance of a direction to the respondents to keep one post reserve of Veterinary Surgeon. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submitted that in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme J&K Public Service Commission vs. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-30075-2024 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Naveen Jhajolia, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Gurnoor S. Sandhu, Advocate Prayer in the present writ petition is for quashing the (Annexure P-10); and further for Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner under BCA Category for the post of Veterinary Surgeon in Animal Husbandry and Dairying Department, Haryana against Advt. No. 41/2022 dated 09.12.2022 (Annexure P-1) ted 22.02.2024 (Annexure P-2) keeping in view the sequel of the facts mentioned and also for issuance of a direction to the respondents to keep one post reserve of Veterinary Surgeon. t the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submitted that in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme J&K Public Service Commission vs. Israr Ahmad and others: quashing the further for directing the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner under BCA Category for the post of Department, 1) 2) keeping in view the sequel of the facts mentioned and also for issuance of a direction to t the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner very fairly submitted that in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Israr Ahmad and others: RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.03 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent. CWP-30075 (2005) 12 Supreme Court Cases 2022, titled as and others, category is not permitted. As such, submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition 3. learned counsel for respondent No. 2 to the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the 4. withdrawn 5. 03.09.2026 rishu 30075-2024 (2005) 12 Supreme Court Cases 498 as well as by this Court i titled as Suman Khatri vs. Haryana Public Service Commission and others, decided on 12.05.2022 and various other matters, change of category is not permitted. As such, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition Learned counsel for respondent learned counsel for respondent No. 2-HPSC the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the In view of the above, the present petition is withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable as well as by this Court in LPA-380- Suman Khatri vs. Haryana Public Service Commission and various other matters, change of rned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition. Learned counsel for respondent No. 1-State as well as HPSC have pleaded ‘no objection’ the aforesaid submission of learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Suman Khatri vs. Haryana Public Service Commission and various other matters, change of as well as ‘no objection’ dismissed as RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.03 17:59 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent.