IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 268 CRM-M-20746-2022 Date of decision: 3rd September, 2026 Priya Garg ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Durgesh Garg, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab. *** MANISHA BATRA, J (ORAL):- 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter having been passed over thrice. 2. Learned State counsel, who has advance notice of the petition, has placed on record a copy of judgment dated 24.08.2026 passed by the trial Court in the same FIR, which is the subject matter of the present case, showing that the petitioner, along with the co-accused, has been acquitted of the charges as framed against her. It is further submitted that the petition stands rendered infructuous. 3. Ordered accordingly. 4. Since the main petition has been dismissed as having been rendered infructuous as well as for non-prosecution, pending application(s), if any, stand rendered infructuous. [MANISHA BATRA] JUDGE 3rd September, 2026 Parveen Sharma 1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No 2. Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN SHARMA 2026.09.03 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document