HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1150/2022 Anoop Singh Son Of Shri Lakhan Singh, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Village Sinsini Tehsil Deeg District Bharatpur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Victim, R/o ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary-GA cum AAG Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore-PP Ms. Sunita Pareek for Mr. Sangeeta Kumari JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/04/2026 1. The instant misc. petition is listed before this Court in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Vijay Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 773/2026, decided on 15.01.2026), wherein the Hon’ble Apex Court observed that in various matters, interim orders have been passed in criminal revision petitions and petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., as a result of which trial relating to serious offences such as murder, rape, dacoity, dowry death, etc., could not proceed and remained stalled/held up due to the passage of considerable time. 2. Directions have been issued to this Court and other High Courts to take up such like matters which are pending since long, (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1150/2022] on priority and decide the same expeditiously without deferring the hearings to subsequent dates. 3. The interim order is operating in the instant petition since 23.02.2022 and every time, time has been sought for arguments and for extension of the interim order. 4. Looking to the fact that the impugned FIR pertains to the year 2022 and the same is lying pending since four years, this Court deems it just and proper to look into the grounds and the contents of the instant petition wherein it has been averred that the petitioner has not committed any offence and he has been falsely implicated in the present matter with an ulterior motive, hence, a prayer has been made to quash the entire proceedings arising out of the impugned FIR. 5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant oppose the prayer made in the present petition. 6. The contents of the impugned FIR reveals the commission of a cognizable offence and the correctness of the allegation cannot be examined by this Court, in exercise of its power contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C as certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer. 7. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of this case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Investigating Officer, who shall consider the same in accordance with law and submit the conclusion report of investigation before the concerned Court. (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1150/2022] 8. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/6