CR-4210-2022 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Saint MSG Glorious International School Edusmart Services Pvt. Ltd. CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocate and Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. LAPITA BANERJI On July 21, 2026, the following order was passed: accommodation has been prayed for. subsisting in favour of the petitioner since After passing of the interim order, the petitioner was no represented on January 25, 2023. Written adjournment were made on July 23, 2024, July 21, 2025, January 19, 2026 and April 7, 2026. could not be served till date to the respondent, for want of the correct address. address arguments on the adjourned date of hearing, appropriate orders shall be passed. 2022 (O&M) Sr. No.103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR Date of Decision : Saint MSG Glorious International School Versus Edusmart Services Pvt. Ltd. HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocate and Mr. Amit Bansal, Advocate, for the petitioner. *** LAPITA BANERJI, J. (Oral) On July 21, 2026, the following order was passed: “No one represents the petitioner and no accommodation has been prayed for. This Court notices that an interim order is subsisting in favour of the petitioner since After passing of the interim order, the petitioner was no represented on January 25, 2023. Written adjournment were made on July 23, 2024, July 21, 2025, January 19, 2026 and April 7, 2026. From the office report, it could not be served till date to the respondent, for want of the correct address. Let fresh notice be issued for If the learned counsel for the petitioner does not address arguments on the adjourned date of hearing, appropriate orders shall be passed. To be shown in the Urgent List.” p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4210-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision :18.08.2026 …Petitioner …Respondent HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocate and On July 21, 2026, the following order was passed:- No one represents the petitioner and no accommodation has been prayed for. This Court notices that an interim order is subsisting in favour of the petitioner since September 28, 2022. After passing of the interim order, the petitioner was not represented on January 25, 2023. Written requests for adjournment were made on July 23, 2024, July 21, 2025, January 19, 2026 and April 7, 2026. From the office report, it appears that notice could not be served till date to the respondent, for want of the Let fresh notice be issued for August 18, 2026. If the learned counsel for the petitioner does not address arguments on the adjourned date of hearing, appropriate orders shall be passed. To be shown in the Urgent List.” VANDANA 2026.08.19 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-4210-2022 (O&M) Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of th prays for withdrawal Dismissed This Court has not appreciated the say the least. August 18, 202 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable 2022 (O&M) Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of th prays for withdrawal of the instant civil revision. Dismissed as withdrawn. This Court has not appreciated the (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 ther speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 2 Today, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner of the instant civil revision. This Court has not appreciated the conduct of the petitioner to (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.08.19 18:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document