Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2022 DAILYLAW 3036 (PNJ)

RAJKEERTI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

CWP/23236/2026 · 2026-07-28

Nidhi Gupta

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-23236 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 133 Rajkeerti State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Constitution of India for quashing impugned charge 30.03.2022 (Annexures P respondents upon the petitioner for the alleged acts of omission a commission for the reasons that they are vitiated owing to delay in disposal and deciding the same in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950; been sought directing the respondents to dec 18.05.2026 (Annexure P petitioner through her counsel and to accept the claim made therein. 2. submits that the petitioner would be satisfied terms of second prayer made in the present petition is issued respondent(s)/Competent Authority concerned legal notice dated 18.05.2026 (Annexure P 36-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Versus State of Haryana and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Satyam Singla, Advocate for NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Article 226 Constitution of India is for issuance of a writ in the nature of for quashing impugned charge-sheets dated 02.08.2021, 29.03.2022 and 30.03.2022 (Annexures P-3, P-7 and P-9, respectively) respondents upon the petitioner for the alleged acts of omission a commission for the reasons that they are vitiated owing to delay in disposal and deciding the same in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950; AND further a writ of been sought directing the respondents to dec 18.05.2026 (Annexure P-17) served upon respondent No. 1 by the petitioner through her counsel and to accept the claim made therein. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied terms of second prayer made in the present petition is issued respondent(s)/Competent Authority concerned legal notice dated 18.05.2026 (Annexure P-17) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-23236-2026 Date of Decision: 28.07.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA , Advocate for the petitioner. filed under Article 226 of the for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari sheets dated 02.08.2021, 29.03.2022 and 9, respectively) serviced by the respondents upon the petitioner for the alleged acts of omission and commission for the reasons that they are vitiated owing to delay in disposal and deciding the same in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the further a writ of Mandamus has also been sought directing the respondents to decided legal notice dated 17) served upon respondent No. 1 by the petitioner through her counsel and to accept the claim made therein. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied at this stage if a direction in terms of second prayer made in the present petition is issued to respondent(s)/Competent Authority concerned to consider and decide the 17) in a time bound manner. of the Certiorari sheets dated 02.08.2021, 29.03.2022 and serviced by the nd commission for the reasons that they are vitiated owing to delay in disposal and deciding the same in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the has also ided legal notice dated 17) served upon respondent No. 1 by the After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner in to RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.29 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-23236 3. 4. of respondent prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, is accepted. 5. into the merits of the present petition, the same is with a direction to forthwith consider (Annexure P with law, within a period of certified copy of this order. 6. 28.07.2026 rishu 36-2026 -2- Notice of motion. Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana of respondent-State and submits that she has prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, is accepted. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without going into the merits of the present petition, the same is with a direction to the respondent(s)/Competent Authority, concerned consider and decide the aforesaid (Annexure P-17) by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance with law, within a period of 03 months certified copy of this order. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Mr. Suneel Ranga, DAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf he has ‘no objection’ in case the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage, is accepted. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without going into the merits of the present petition, the same is disposed of at this stage /Competent Authority, concerned, to aforesaid legal notice dated 18.05.2026 by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance from the date of receipt of a Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No accepts notice on behalf in case the After hearing learned counsel for the parties, without going , to 18.05.2026 by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance from the date of receipt of a RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.29 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.