Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2022 DAILYLAW 3020 (PNJ)

VIKAS SHARMA v. HAYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PADHIKARAN AND ORS

CWP/7363/2022 · 2026-07-27

Subhas Mehla, Vikas Bahl

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 233 CWP No.7363 of 2022 Date of decision: July 27th, 2026 Vikas Sharma .....Petitioner Versus Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Harkirat Singh, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for the respondents. VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that since the petitioner has been allotted the plot, thus, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the same, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE July 27th, 2026 (SUBHAS MEHLA) Puneet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No PUNEET SACHDEVA 2026.07.27 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh