RAKESH HASMUKH GOYANI v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (SRA) AND 3 ORS
WP/3626/2022 · 2026-07-07
Shri M S Karnik, Shri S M Modak
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2992 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2992 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
19-wp 3626-22.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3626 OF 2022 Rakesh Hasmukh Goyani … Petitioner Versus Chief Executive Officer (SRA) & Ors. ... Respondents __________________________ Mr. Deepak Pandey for the Petitioner. Mr. R. P. Ojha for Respondent No.4. Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni a/w. Ms. Sweta Shah for Respondent Nos.1 & 2-SRA. __________________________
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND
S. M. MODAK, JJ. DATED : 7 th JULY, 2026. P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner’s grievance is that he has not been allotted a tenement though he is legally entitled to such alternate rehab premises. In paragraph No.6 of the Affidavit-in-Reply filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2-SRA, it is stated thus:-
“6. I say that the all Tenements in this Scheme have already been allotted and no Tenements are available for allotment, but in this Scenario the petitioner can be given PAP tenement in any other scheme of his choice as per list of available PAPs with SRA. In view of the Office Order dated 20.03.2025, the Slum Rehabilitation Authority shall calculate the valuation of the SRA’s society Tenement in which the petitioner is seeking a PAP Tenement. If the valuation Amk 1/2 ARJUN MACHHINDRA KADAM Digitally signed by ARJUN MACHHINDRA KADAM Date: 2026.07.07 18:00:11 +0530
19-wp 3626-22.doc of the PAP Tenement, based on the Ready Reckoner Rate, is higher than that of the Petitioner’s SRA’s Society Tenement, and if the Petitioner agrees to pay the difference amount as calculated according to the Ready Reckoner Rate for the available PAP tenements, then the Petitioner’s application may be considered in accordance with law. Hereto annexed Exhibit “D” is a copy of the office Order dated 20.03.2025.”
3. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner says that an appropriate application shall be made to the SRA within a period of two weeks from today. On such an application is made, the SRA in terms of paragraph No.6 shall allot a suitable tenement to the petitioner. Since the petitioner is agreeable to pay the difference amount as per the Ready Reckoner Rate, there should be no difficulty in completing the process of allotment which we expect the same to be done within a period of eight weeks from the date of the application including the handing over the tenement. 4.
The petition is disposed of. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Amk 2/2