Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 2946 (BOM)

DHONDIRAM TULSHIRAM MADALE AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/213/2022 · 2026-04-08

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

Special Leave Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 916-wp-213-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 WRIT PETITION NO. 213 OF 2022 Dhondiram Tulshiram Madale And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Mr. Ashwin Sakolkar h/f Mr. V.G. Sakolkar., Advocate for the Petitioners Mr. A.V. Lavte, AGP for State ....... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 08th APRIL, 2026 ORDER : 1. At outset, learned advocate for the petitioners by relying on the decision of the Apex Court in SLP (C) Nos. 2587-2593 of 2021 submits that petitioners may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file appropriate application after the decision of first appeals filed by the claimants in the same acquisition proceedings. 2. Permission is granted. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 3. The point of delay is kept open for consideration. (VAISHALI PATIL JADHAV, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) Bhagyawant Punde 2026:BHC-AUG:15769-DB