CRA-D-384-2022 and other connected cases 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 1 Date of decision: 13.07.2026 CRA-D-384-2022 GURSEWAK SINGH SANDHUR@JAZZY ...Appellant VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent 2 CRA-D-534-2022 (O&M) MANINDER SINGH @ HAPPY ...Appellant VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent 3 CRA-D-677-2022 (O&M) MANGAL SINGH @ MANGA ...Appellant VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent 4 CRA-D-678-2022 (O&M) MOHIT SHARMA @ LACCHI ….Appellant VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent 5 CRA-D-686-2022 (O&M) BALJINDER SINGH @ BILLA ….Appellant VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent JYOTI 2026.07.15 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-D-384-2022 and other connected cases 2 6 CRA-D-687-2022 (O&M) LOVEPREET SIGH @ LOVE ….Appellant VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ...Respondent CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate with Mr. Harmeet Singh, Advocate, for the appellant in CRA-D-384-2022. Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate and Mr. Mandeep Singla, Advocate, for the appellant in CRA-D-534-2022. Mr. Saurav Bhatia, Advocate, for the appellant in CRA-D-677-2022, CRA-D-678-2022, CRA-D-686-2022 and CRA-D-687-2022. Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Addl. AG, Punjab. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , J.(ORAL) CRM-30031-2022 in CRA-D-677-2022 Allowed as prayed for. CRM-30032-2022 in CRA-D-678-2022 Allowed as prayed for. CRM-30212-2022 in CRA-D-687-2022 Allowed as prayed for. CRM-30242-2022 in CRA-D-687-2022 Allowed as prayed for. Main case(s) The present appeals, have been filed by the accused persons for JYOTI 2026.07.15 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-D-384-2022 and other connected cases 3 seeking regular bail in case bearing FIR No.140 dated 07.05.2020, under Sections 384, 465, 467, 468, 471, 473, 489 IPC, Section 25 of Arms Act, Section 13, 18 of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 (Sections 120- B, 482, 121, 121-A, 122 of IPC and Section 19 of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 1967 added later on), registered at Police Station Sultanpur Lodhi, District Kapurthala. 2 Without commenting into the merits of the case(s), learned counsel for the appellant (s) contend that all the appellants herein, have been released on interim bail on different dates viz. July/August, 2022 and the same is tabulated as under:- Sr. No. Name Custody since Recovery 1 Baljinder Singh @ Billa CRA-D-686-2022 08.05.2020 on interim since 30th Aug, 2022 9MM Pistol, 30 bore, 2.5. lakh cash, and some 150 live cartridges and 2 passports and $100 Australian, 10 Pamphlets of Khalistan Commando Force 2 Drum Machine Guns 2 Lovepreet Singh @ Love Dhillon CRA-D-687-2022 08.05.2020 on interim since 30th Aug, 2022 One Pistol 30 Bore and 33 Live Cartridges, One 315 Bore Rifle 56 Live Cartridges, 2 cars with fake numbers 3 Mohit Shama CRA-D-678-2022 08.05.2020 on interim since 30th Aug, 2022 315 Bore Rifle with 35 Live Cartridges 4 Mangal Singh @ Manga CRA-D-677-2022 08.05.2020 on interim since 30th Aug, 2022 One pistol 9 MM, 10 Live Cartridges 5 Maninderjit Singh @ Happy 08.05.2020 on interim since 29th July 2022 One 9MM Pistol, 13 Live Cartridges JYOTI 2026.07.15 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-D-384-2022 and other connected cases 4 Details of the accused persons added later on in the present FIR are as under:- 6 Gursewak Singh @ Jazzy 12.06.2020 on interim bail since 29th Aug, 2022 None 3 Learned counsel for the appellants further contend that certain co-accused have already been granted the concession of regular bail and the orders stand confirmed in their favour. The details of the same are tabulated as under:- Sr. No. Name Case No. Date of decision 1 Lovepreet Singh @ Love CRA-D-731-2022 25.09.2023 2 Sukhjinder Singh @ Bittu CRA-D-1103-2022 01.09.2025 3 Kuldeep Singh CRA-D-133-2023 26.09.2025 4 Learned counsel further contend that the trial has so far not commenced and no witness has been examined. As per case of the prosecution, there are 38 witnesses yet to be examined. It is further submitted that there is no allegation that any of the appellants has misused the concession of interim bail granted in their favour. 5 Accordingly the interim orders dated 30.08.2022 passed in CRA-D-686-2022 titled as Baljinder Singh @ Billa Vs. State of Punjab, CRA-D-687-2022 titled as Lovepreet Singh @ Love Dhillon Vs. State of Punjab, CRA-D-678-2022 tilted as Mohit Sharma @ Lacchi Vs. State of Punjab, CRA-D-677-2022 titled as Mangal Singh @ Manga Vs. State of Punjab, dated 29.07.2022 passed in CRA-D-534-2022 titled as Maninderjit Singh @ Happy Vs. State of Punjab, order dated 29.08.2022 passed in CRA-D-384-2022 titled as Gursewak Singh @ Jazzy Vs. State of Punjab, respectively, are made absolute. JYOTI 2026.07.15 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-D-384-2022 and other connected cases 5 6 Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) 13.07.2026 JUDGE jyoti3 Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No JYOTI 2026.07.15 09:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document