MOHIT SHARMA v. SHRI VISHWAKARMA SKILL UNIVERSITY AND ORS
CWP/7157/2022 · 2026-07-14
Harpreet Singh Brar
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2914 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 2914 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
227 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7157-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Mohit Sharma
....Petitioner
Versus Shri Vishwakarma Skill University and others ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Manish Kumar Dadwal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate for the respondents.
HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL)
1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondents to produce entire record of selection and after perusing the same issue writ in the nature of certiorari/mandamus/prohibition directing the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioner by issuing appointment letter to the post of Skill Assistant Professor (Mechanical Engineering). Further, to appoint the petitioner from the date when Sunil Kumar Sharma has been appointed and also grant all consequential benefits from the date when similarly placed persons were appointed to the post of Skill Assistant Professor (Mechanical Engineering). Further, for issuance of a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondents to fill up the post which were advertised by the respondents against which the petitioner has competed.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer to the extent NEHA 2026.07.15 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh
CWP-7157-2022 (O&M) -2- the he would be satisfied in case a direction is issued to the respondents- University to provide the petitioner complete particulars of the result with a break-up of written examination, presentation and interview in terms of the criteria set out in the advertisement.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents-University submits that he has no objection to the same and the break-up of the marks obtained by the petitioner in the written examination, presentation and interview shall be supplied to the petitioner within a period of two weeks.
4. In view of the submissions made by counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of. The respondents-University is directed to provide the break-up of the marks obtained by the petitioner in the written examination, presentation and interview within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
5. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 14.07.2026 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NEHA 2026.07.15 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh