Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2022 DAILYLAW 2911 (BOM)

MANGALABAI BAPURAO ALIAS BAPUSAHEB LOKHANDE AND OTHERS v. SHAKUNTALABAI BAPURAO ALIAS BAPUSAHEB LOKHANDE AND OTHERS

WP/2657/2022 · 2026-02-12

Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Dilwale 1 91-WP-2657-22.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 91 WRIT PETITION NO. 2657 OF 2022 Mangalabai Bapurao Alias Bapusaheb Lokhande And Others VERSUS Shakuntalabai Bapurao Alias Bapusaheb Lokhande And Others ... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr. A. A. Joshi h/f Mr. Natu Sharad V. AGP for Respondent No.3: Mrs. D. S. Jape Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: Mr. Gaikwad P. M. & Gaikwad R. M. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 12.02.2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The petitioners seek permission to delete the name of respondent No.3. Permission is granted to delete the name of respondent No.3 at the risk of the petitioners. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith. 3. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 06.12.2021 passed by the learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad below Exhibit-38 in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 646 of 2015, whereby the application filed by the petitioners seeking amendment came to be rejected. 4. The learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that on instructions, he has no objection if the said application is allowed. 5. In view of the above, the present writ petition is allowed. The order 2026:BHC-AUG:6476 Dilwale 2 91-WP-2657-22.odt dated 06.12.2021 passed by the learned 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad below Exhibit-38 in Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 646 of 2015 is quashed and set aside. The application below Exhibit- 38 stands allowed. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE