Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2022 DAILYLAW 2894 (PNJ)

SAHIL JAGLAN v. HARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ANOTHER

CWP/11216/2022 · 2026-07-10

Aman Chaudhary

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 207 CWP-11216-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 10.07.2026 Sahil Jaglan ....Petitioner Versus Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission and Another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. D.S. Patwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aditya Kush and Ms. Priyanka Chaudhary, Advocates for the petitioner Mr. Arjun Pratap Atma Ram, Advocate for the respondents ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that quorum for deciding the appeal was incomplete as it was decided by only one member, which stands recorded in order issuing notice of motion, in view of which, he prays that case be remanded to the Appellate Authority for reconsideration. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction that the appeal be decided afresh by the Competent Authority, expeditiously, in accordance with law. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 10.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.10 16:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document