IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 235 CWP-17087-2022 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.07.2026 Suresh Chauhan ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present:- Mr. Dharamjit, Advocate for Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana Mr. Jagbir Malik, Advocate for respondent No.4 Mr. Sunil K. Dhanda, Advocate for respondent No.6 ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 while referring to the reply filed dated 15.11.2023, states that no adverse order has been passed against the petitioner as only an officer has been appointed to conduct a preliminary enquiry with regard to the veracity of the allegations made in the complaint filed by respondent No.6. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as pre- mature. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 09.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.10 15:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document